Listen to the Sci-Fi Files Radio Show
User Profile | Join Now! | Logout
Next: "Terra Nova" (R)
Star Trek: Voyager
ST: Deep Space Nine
ST: Next Generation
ST: Original Series
Star Trek X: Nemesis
Central/Main BBS
Gaming/Books BBS
Fan Fiction BBS
Support BBS
Live Chat
Ron Moore Archive
Contact & Staff Info

Minor Dispatches

Dec 21 | As a prelude to the UK Sky One satellite premiere of "Broken Bow" on January 7th, BBC Radio Five Live will feature the show and guests Jolene Blalock and Dominic Keating on January 5th @ 9:05p. (More details).
Dec 21 | Roy Brocksmith, who played 'Zakrem' in TNG's "Peak Performance" and 'Raxka Karn' in DS9's "Indiscretion," died Sunday at age 56. Full obituary.
Dec 20 | Star uploaded a new video interview with Scott Bakula here
Dec 16 | New Screenshots from Bridge Commander have been posted at GameSpyDaily
Dec 14 | New screenshots from Activision's 2002 release 'Bridge Commander' here.

Upcoming LIVE Events

Weekly Promos/Photos just uploaded for download the TNG Season 1 DVD Promo here.


  • Dec. 28, 2001: TNN TNG "All in the Family" mini-marathon 3-8p
  • Dec. 30, 2001: TNN TNG "Strange Effects" mini-marathon 3-8p
  • Feb. 26, 2002: UK ENTERPRISE premiere on Sky One (satellite customers only)
  • Mar. 4, 2002: TNG Season 1 DVD Box Set U.S. Release
  • 3rd Qtr., 2002: UK ENTERPRISE premiere on Channel 4 (non-satellite customers)
  • 2002: Click here for full 2002 TREK DVD/VHS UK release dates.

    Amazon Honor System Click Here to Give Learn More

    TrekWeb's Star Trek Book Store has been freshly revamped and stocked with all the latest titles, so stop on in and help support TrekWeb!

    Star Trek: The Motion Picture - The Director's Edition
    Directed by Robert Wise

    Black Star is the UK's largest video store and offers free shipping worldwide! - The UK's Biggest Video Store
    Copyright 1996-2001 Steve Krutzler and TrekWeb.COM. All Rights Reserved.
    Writer Andre Bormanis Talks ENTERPRISE In TrekWeb's Online Chat; Transcript Inside!

    Posted: 22:57:14 on November 06 2001
    By: Steve Krutzler
    Dept: Enterprise |

    ENTERPRISE writer Andre Bormanis joined TrekWeb for an online chat last night. He talked all about the show including upcoming episodes. If you missed the event, the full transcript is below!

    Welcome to TrekWeb's live chat with ENTERPRISE writer Andre Bormanis! Stay tuned for the winners of TrekWeb's 5th Anniversary NX-01 Hat Giveaway following the chat. This chat is Copyright (C) 2001 All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission please.

    Welcome Andre (and sorry for the tech problems), thanks for joining us tonight! Would you like to make any opening remarks before we begin with questions?

    Andre Bormanis
    Thanks for inviting me to this chat. I'm looking forward to everyone's questions.

    Ok then, shall we begin?

    Andre Bormanis
    Let's go.

    Can you tell us to what degree you have input in most ENT stories as a staff writer, and whether you will personally write any stories or teleplays soon? Also are you doubling as science consultant on ENT?

    Andre Bormanis
    Most of the staff writers contribute something to each show, from the development of the story to the writing of the script. I still help with the science on the show; for example, I worked quite a bit on the comet stuff in tomorrow night's episode. The first script that I wrote largely on my own will air early next year: Silent Enemy. But like any script, I got a lot of guidance and ideas from the rest of the staff, particularly Brannon Braga, our "show runner." I guess I should type "*" when I'm done. * :)

    So will you have full teleplay credit on "Silent Enemy" then?

    Andre Bormanis

    Capt. Mike asks: Since this is only 150 years into the future, will religion be discussed and shown being a part of the crew's lives? DS9 showed that spiritual beliefs in a higher power is alive and well in the 24th century.

    Andre Bormanis
    You'll see an episode in a few weeks, "Cold Front," that features a group of alien pilgrims on a spiritual quest. I don't know that spiritual themes will be developed on Enterprise to the extent they were on DS9, but they will crop up from time to time.*

    "Cold Front" will also feature the return of the Suliban villain Silik and some further development of the Temporal Cold War storyline, correct?

    Andre Bormanis
    That's right. Something else that distinguished Enterprise from other Treks is that a concept like time travel is a real "mind blower" for Archer and company. They think of it as science fiction, whereas it was established fact in all the other series.*

    Thrax asks: Hi. Can we expect a strong story arc to last the run, ala DS9 and the Dominion, in the new series?

    Andre Bormanis
    I think the temporal cold war will be a continuing saga for the series, and the relationship between humans and Vulcans will probably evolve -- that will be an interesting arc, I think.*

    TrekWeb asks: We recently learned that Jeff Combs and the Andorians will return in "Shadow of P'Jem." Can you give us any more tidbits about this episode and comment on what appears to be the development of a recurring plotline involving the Andorians, who we know are one of the founding worlds of the Federation?

    Andre Bormanis
    The Andorians were such great characters, you can count on seeing them again. As far as how our relationship with them will change in the future, that's something that we'll discover as we continue writing new epsiodes for these characters.*

    Greg Limardi asks: Would you ever consider using the events in First Contact as a point of historical divergence, to explain some continutiy problems? For example, the reason the Enterprise looks like it does, and in fact has the name Enterprise is because of Cocrane's experience in First Contact.

    Andre Bormanis
    We're trying as best we can to maintain series continuity. It's hard, afger 600 episodes of Trek, to stay on top of it all. Plus, there were a number of continuity errors in the original series. The time frame, for example, wasn't established as the 22nd sorry 23rd! -- century until late in the first season. But we do want to stay true to the general flow of events established in the other shows and movies...*

    Dan Heim asks: I've always enjoyed the inter-series cameos, like Bones' visit to the ship in the first episode of ST:TNG. What I'd really like to see on Enterprise is a "cameo" by a young Kirk (if it fits the timeline), done by computer animation from existing clips of the younger Shatner. After seeing Shrek I know this could be done.

    Andre Bormanis
    It could be done, and we might someday consider doing that. Right now I think we want to establish these characters on their own, give the audience a chace to get to know them independent of other established characters.*

    Shane asks: Why can't T'Pol wear a uniform like the rest of the crew? To me its a turn off to watch her prance around in a catsuit. When will we females get a chance to see a GUY prance around in boxers-half naked for a full 7 seasons? If she's apart of the crew, I think she should wear the same thing as the rest of the crew, or at least a Vulcan equivalent.

    Andre Bormanis
    You raise a valid point. Right now we want to make it clear that T'Pol is part of the crew, but also separate; you'll notice that Phlox doesn't wear a uniform either -- he's also an outsider. Clearly T'Pol's costume is intended to suggest a rather mysterious and sensual woman, someone who the audience will immediately recognize as a different kind of character.*

    The_Tom asks: Playing around with the conventional idea of a narrative has been somewhat in vogue lately: Films like Memento have been well-recieved, and The X-Files has done quite a few episodes that break from the standard mould of telling a story. Might part of the "reinvigoration" of the franchise promised in Enterprise mean seeing not only a fresh universe in which the characters interact, but also some innovative and radical ways of framing a stories?

    Andre Bormanis
    We're going to be doing some experiementing, going against convention from time to time. For example, not every epsiode needs to have a tidy little "tag" at the end that sums up the message of the show. As for something more radical, like Memento, it really depends on the story. If that kind of structure best serves the story, then that's the structure we'll use. Utlimately the structure should serve the story, not vice-versa.*

    Peter Mantzioros asks: Hi there, I would like to know when and if Star Trek will lift the ban on allowing outside potential writers to submit spec scripts like on previous series?

    Andre Bormanis
    I'm not sure if a decision has been made on that. We're not taking spec submissions this season, but I haven't heard if that will be true next season.*

    Bill asks: After the episode 'Unexpected', I was suprised to see a 23rd century Klingon Battlecruiser. Are you guys telling us that design now predates back to the 22nd century? I would have thought you'd design something similar to the Enterprise.

    Andre Bormanis
    I think what we're suggesting is that Klingon technology evolves pretty slowly. It's not unlike Russian rocket technology: their Soyuz capsules really haven't changed all that much in 35 years or so. I think the Klingon attitude is, if the design that works why change it?*

    Berserker asks: Can you give us any info (plot, credits, etc.) about the episode "Sleeping Dogs"?

    Andre Bormanis
    It starts shooting next week, but I probably shouldn't share any details; sorry. But it's going to be a VERY fun episode!*

    CaptainPike asks: Will we see nods to TOS such as the Valiant heading to deep space, where they'll eventually face destruction in "Where No Man..." or the Horizon's contamination of the Sigma Iotians, or run into the Tellarites?

    Andre Bormanis
    I think we'll layer in references to other ships and species on a pretty regular basis. Look for a fun Malurian reference in an upcoming episode...*

    Salvador Nogueira asks: With your extensive experience as science consultant, how is the balance achieved between science fact and fiction in each story, and who determines which predominates in a specific episode? Could you tell us a little bit about how science is being treated in Enterprise, and how different is this approach from the one used in previous series?

    Andre Bormanis
    In a nutshell, the science has to serve the story. We went out of our way to get the science right in this week's episode, and it really helped the story. Since this show takes place in an earlier era, we want to keep the science closer to today's science and so you won't see as much in the way of "spatial anomalies" and so forth. On the other hand, Enterprise is science fiction, so we do feel free to invent new phenomena and theories once in a while.*

    Cecil L asks: In the opening credits Amelia Earhart is shown (brief flash) standing next to an aircraft. My guess is that the plane is a Lockheed Vega not the Electra in which she attempted the round-the-world flight. Can your confirm this?

    Andre Bormanis
    I think you know more about it than me! It probably is newsreel footage from a few years before her ill-fated last flight.*

    DomenicV asks: Will the writers draw from the many books and articles written about the period from 2061 to the 23rd century as templates for stories? It seems that this would be a vast source of ideas Andre Bormanis
    If you look at the Star Trek Chronology, you'll see that there really isn't a lot of information on the late 22nd, through early 23rd centuries. But we can certainly do some extrapolating, and we spend a fair amount of time looking at books like the Chronolgy to see if we might find interesting directions for stories that build on established elements from the Trek universe.*

    Can you tell us when you were brought into the development of the series and what role you may have played in those stages? Any interesting stories? ;-)

    Andre Bormanis
    I came in not long before we started shooting the pilot. I had a few ideas about stories, and some thoughts on how the technology of Enterprise NX-01 would be more basic than future ships. I've always felt it was important to keep reminding the audience that our sensors are not quite as capable as those on future ships, our medical facilities not as advanced, and so forth. This crew is a group of pioneers, and exploring deep space is an even riskier and more difficult business for them than it was (will be) for Kirk and later crews.*

    Along those lines, what are the current plans for use of the Universal Translator and Hoshi Sato? In "The Andorian Incident" it seemed as easy to communicate with a new alien race as in previous TREKs...

    Andre Bormanis
    We want to make it clear that alien languages are truly alien, but some are easier to translate than others. It's a little tricky sometimes from a story-telling standpoint to constantly have to translate everything that's being said by an alien. Our communicators have built-in UT's, and it seems clear that they had no trouble locking-on to the Andorian language. I would expect non-humanoid species to generally be harder to deal with.*

    Narrative economy is certainly a good point. Perhaps one of the cinematic departures alluded to earlier might be a usage of the UT wherein we "hear" Archer's perspective of an alien speaking, and then Hoshi's perspective as she "decodes it" with her superb mental abilities. Thoughts?

    Andre Bormanis
    That could be fun to see. One of the things people sometimes \ wonder about the UT is whether the voices of the aliens come out of the communicators. Technology exists today that could "throw" a voice coming from a loudspeaker into the mouth of the person speaking, so that from your perspective, it sounds like the aliens themselves are speaking the translated language.*

    Face to face communication not through the communicator device is translated via an ear-implanted UT, correct? An explicit usage of this in ENT might be interesting.

    Andre Bormanis
    I'm not sure we've established the ear-implanted UT on this series although I believe that was done on DS9...*

    The_Tom asks: Fairly dry question here, Andre. Can you give us some upcoming titles (beyond "Sleeping Dogs")? As of today, what's just been finished? What's being shot? Most of the titles on the latest scripts are considered tentative until we are close to finishing the shoot. We're currently filming episode 14, if you count the pilot as 1 and 2, and we'll do a total of 26 this season. The episode that's currently shooting is called "Shadows of P'jem.*

    Siobhan asks: Hi, Andre. Do you know if Hoshi Sato and Travis Mayweather will get any "A" storylines this season?

    Andre Bormanis
    Hoshi was prominently featured in "Fight or Flight"... Travis is a big part of a story that should air in a few weeks. We have a great cast on this show, and we plan to give all of them a lot to do...*

    Golf464 asks: The show Broken Bow in the beginning when the statement was made about the beginning of starfleet. Was the meaning of the statement having to do with changing the name from UESPA / UESN to starFleet? Or is it a new organization altogether started with the help of the vulcans?

    Andre Bormanis
    I think Starfleet is an organization that was started on Earth, without the help of the Vulcans. UESPA and UESN are probably larger "umbrella" organizations that include Starfleet as one element.*

    Bucky asks: Continuity is probably the biggest monkey on the back of the writers of ENTERPRISE when it comes to dealing with the hardcore fans. There's also a few biggies commin up: basically in TREK continuity there is supposed to be a Romulan/Human war down the line. How do the writers decide which aspects to pay attention too and which ones to disregard?

    Andre Bormanis
    It really depends on where we can find good stories. If we can find a good story that involves some aspect of the Earth / Romulan war, we'll go with it. If not, I think there's enough flexibility in the timeline to suggest that it happened just after Enterprise's mission. I think the next question will have to be my last.*

    covetom asks: Do you find being closer to contemporary times makes it easier or harder to be scientifically accurate in the writing of Enterprise? While you would have more frames of references in that current technology is closer, you also cannot take the same liberties you can with technology that is so far off.

    Andre Bormanis
    I think for the most part, it's easier. We can be more grounded in our science, keep it more focused on the geology of alien planets, the biology of alien life forms. The "science" I always find hardest is the weird "anomaly" stuff...*

    Thanks Andre for joining us tonight! We sincerely hope that you will be able to join us again soon to discuss ENTERPRISE! And we'll all look for your first teleplay, "Silent Enemy"

    Andre Bormanis
    I hope so. Thank you, and I hope all of you continue to enjoy the show!* And now here are the winners of the TrekWeb 5th Anniversary NX-01 Hat Giveaway!

    Jason Boxman
    Thanks!! :)

    Andrew Rayfield of Austalia Stephen Liddell of England Chrisopher Sheehy of Massachussetts Allen Shane Ditty Thanks to the Star Trek: Communicator for providing the hats! And don't miss TrekWeb's William Shatner interview and Q&A, to be posted next week. You can submit questions to This chat is Copyright (C) 2001 All rights reserved. No reproduction without permission.

    See Also: Mission Logs

    Season One (2001-2002)
    Prod #Title
    721 Broken Bow (pilot)
    103 Fight or Flight
    104 Strange New World
    105 Unexpected
    106 Terra Nova
    107 The Andorian Incident
    108 Breaking the Ice
    109 Civilization
    110 Fortunate Son
    111 Cold Front
    112 Silent Enemy
    113 Dear Doctor
    114 Shadows of P'jem
    115 Sleeping Dogs
    116 Rogue Planet
    117 Shuttlepod One
    118 Equilibrium (tentative)


    Sort Controls:
    Start New Thread | Help!


    Add TrekWeb Headlines To Your Site!

    With the new STAR TREK near the half-way mark, how would you rate ENTERPRISE overall?
    9-10: Excellent! The series is superb in every respect!
    7-8: Great! The series is wonderful with only a few rough edges!
    5-6: Good. The potential is there but the series has yet to tap into it.
    3-4: Mediocre! So far the series is not much different than previous TREKs and the quality is questionable.
    1-2: Abhorrent! The series is rotten through and through from premise to execution!
    No vote: Choices unacceptable!
    Current Results

    Stories Board


    Cinescape Magazine
    Sci-Fi Channel
    Cyber Sci-Fi Network
    The Sci-Fi Files Radio Show


    Fan Media
    Star Trek Store
    Pocket Books


    Section 31
    Voyager's Delights
    Psi Phi
    The Great Link
    Optical Data Network
    The Trekker Newsletter


    HISPATREK (Spanish)
    Trek Brasilis (Portuguese) (German) (German) (Italian)